3 minutes to read. By author Michaela Mora on December 9, 2013 Topics: Business Strategy, Market Research, Qualitative Research
Using customer events to conduct focus groups is fraught with problems. Marketers faced with budget constraints come up with very “creative” solutions.”
However, behind these solutions, there is often a lack of understanding of how departing from certain methodological rules can bias the results and render the research useless.
This cartoon by Tom Fishburne makes fun of how often focus groups are used for the wrong purpose. I’d say this also happens when the purpose is unclear.
I can’t emphasize enough the importance of having clear objectives. We also need to be aware of what focus groups can and cannot accomplish. For more on this, check When Using Focus Groups Makes Sense and Common Mistakes When Doing Focus Groups.
The article accompanying the cartoon brings also attention to another aspect of focus groups, namely, the focus group setting.
In traditional focus groups, participants are typically brought to a conference room. The goal is to have a focused discussion on a particular issue, free of distractions.
Participants don’t have any choice other than to engage in the discussion driven by the moderator. Focus Group rooms are a neutral space where participants are expected to be free to express their opinions, good or bad.
In a recent project, Fishburne’s team decided to skip the “drab conference room with a one-way mirror.” They decided to “treat the groups as a VIP event, held in the company’s hip offices at night over drinks.” This is a good approach for a customer relationship campaign, but hardly for research.
Running focus groups at a company’s headquarters is convenient and cheap for the client. However, this puts a lot of pressure on participants who are likely to give socially desirable answers.
Think for a moment: How openly critical are you going to be of the party host when you are treated as a VIP and offered alcohol?
The intention of this format was to create a more casual atmosphere implying that a more formal environment would be detrimental.
I’m not against running a discussion in a less formal environment. Some focus group facilities can arrange rooms in different ways to make them look like living rooms, lounges, etc. Still, in these environments, there is a touch of neutrality that fosters free discussions.
Fishburne goes further to say he really likes the “scrappy market research approach” taken by Upwell for a new product called Walhub. This was essentially an informal ethnographic/observational study.
Let’s get this clear:
I agree with Fishburne when he says that focus groups are only one tool in the market research toolkit. There are other ways to gather consumer insights.
Nonetheless, relaxing valuable rules in market research methods and making them a degraded version of the original are NOT “other ways to gather consumer insights.” Use them and expect crappy results.
Share on:
Subscribe to our newsletter to get notified about future articles
Subscribe and don’t miss anything!
Subscribe
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.